>>78896608You mustn't be very familiar with women.
One of the biggest logic/anti-logic aspects of female attraction basically works like this:
Girl sees guy walking around by himself:
>No wonder he's alone, he's not very attractive>He's attractive, so there must be some other kind of serious red flags for him to be single. Maybe he's poor or abusive or something>He is clearly undesirable, since he doesn't have a woman>Just look at that lack of confidence. Surely that's what's causing his lack of a relationship, and not the other way around>I don't want that social reject, I'm not even giving him the time of dayGirl sees guy walking around with his girlfriend/wife:
>Holy shit, if she finds him attractive, he clearly must be>He isn't that hot, but he must be rich or charming or super awesome for her to be into him like that>Evidence shows that he is a proven appealing relationship candidate>He has kids, so he is also a proven loving father figure>He has proven and demonstrates social mastery, as such he is extremely desirable>Who cares if he's "taken" or has a "family" with her, I'm just going to jack up my tits and see if I can take him for myselfIt makes sense in the sense that the guy is clearly good relationship material, given his successful relationship, but it's retarded in the sense that he's clearly taken and spoken for, yet the single guy, who is available, is perceived as a reject.