>>77956659You define social justice as striving towards acceptance and tolerance and fairness for all, because of or in spite of the differences.
The current school of SJWs are not about that kind of fairness, acceptance and justice. They're about overturning systems of power and oppression, defined as things owned by the majority. AKA: The straight, white, heterosexual power structure. This is why they define racism not as the undo prejudice one suffers at the hands of another over preconceived bigotry and ideas and feelings rooted in insecurity towards another by their perceived race, but they believe racism is Power + Privilege.
Which is why they believe you cannot be racist if you are not white, you can only be sexist against women, and you can only be homophobic, not heterophobic.
They see whites as having all the money, all the land, all the social power, all the numbers, and so they believe even if white people were gangslammed by groups of non-white people, it'd be a murder, not an act of racism or racial prejudice.
They see men as embodiments of Patriarchy, so men cannot suffer from sexism as sexism itself is a tool concocted by patriarchy to control men and women.
They see women as perpetual victims of Patriarchy, and even if you cite special privileges and protections and benefits that being a woman brings, they still cite Patriarchy as being the source of these privileges and protections and exemptions, which is the embodiment of male power and male dominance over women. Thus, they have no accountability for the things they enjoy, and take no responsibility for them. Instead, they see it as a good argument for fighting against Patriarchy, as they believe Patriarchy harms everybody.
It's like a Trotskyist got in bed with a feminist from the suburbs of Orange County and this retarded bullshit is their baby.
