>>77843118Good list, but bad choice of pictures and lacking basic photoshop skills. You might want to broaden your horizons a bit.
>>77843244It's shit, but I think you already know that. Bonus points for no /a/ or /v/, though.
>>77843275Couple of great choices, but overall it's a pretty bad list.
>>77843415A+ taste, and all /co/. Nice.
>>77843424Not sure why you felt the need to include their names, but a good list anyway.
>>77843469I can't comprehend how one person can have such great tastes and such awful tastes combined in one image.
>>77843507Porn sluts/10
>>77843583You've obviously got one specific type you like and you stick to it. I certainly don't disapprove of your taste (quite the opposite), but some variety would be good for you.
>>77843614Not a bad list, but a bit too bland for me.
>>77843664Greedy son of a bitch, aren't you? Great list though.
>>77843779>>77843801A couple that I'd consider poor choices, but overall it looks like it'll be a nice list when you actually finish it.
>>77843869It's not entirely bad, but too many bad picks to consider good.
