>>127308736>Actually, IRL human cloning shouldn't be that profitable, I think.But this is not real life, it's a movie. Scientific and logical impossibilities can be generally ignored as long as what's being shown isn't constant with the rest of the fictional world.
>raising until they are of age to donateRemember that scene in World where Simon Masrani goes to Wu after the Indom has escaped and demands answers? Wu says
>Cuttlefish genes were added to help withstand an accelerated growth rate.Now Wu may have been lying and just saying that as a cover for the real reason they used cuttlefish genes (chromatophores that allow the skin colour change/camouflage), but there's a very good chance that the accelerated growth rate things is also true. They've just sank millions of dollars into this project and they'd want results as soon as possible, so speed up it's growth. But you also don't want it to go through it's whole life span with in a couple of years, meaning that you'd have to folk out more money for another one. So you work out how to decelerate it's growth rate.
And if that's not possible in the real world, well once again it's a fucking movie about dinosaurs that were cloned from blood taken from a 65 million year old mosquito in amber.
Now if you apply that to human organs, you could (with in the films universe) grow a kidney in a laboratory that would be fully mature within a year, that stops it's speed growing at that point and starts aging normally. Would that really be something too far fetched for a movie about a cloned dinosaur theme park?
