>>125777972I'm really not, because you're insisting on the "building up to nothing" not understanding the point is "build up to a satisfying conclusion to the specific plot it's in at the moment, and then start a new plot". You'd be right in describing that as the average superhero comic if this were, say, 1955, but it's certainly not been the average for superhero comics since the 90s, which instead focus on what you're insisting, the appearance of changing the very core of the cast without ever delivering on that.
I'm describing you something like Tintin, like the Phantom, even like old school movie serials where the hero and his cast would remain the same and the serial would focus on what's the new adventure he's in, you're telling me I'm describing 2000s Spider-Man. Because you can't relate to comics that exist outside of that superhero template. So yes, once again, I'll tell you to read more and different things.
>>125778018He absolutely did and I blame a lot of his bad writing now on that, but he's also mentioned things like X-Force in the past.
