>>124616350To make a comparison, his Pacifica is much more recognizable, and that's because he doesn't really take large liberties with what's probably her most defining physical character trait - that being her huge, long hair with a segmented fringe - besides just throwing in a hairband to segment it a bit more. Sure, it's naturally harder to say "that's Pacifica" because it's ultimately an aged-up design, but the most recognizable part is clearly retained, even when he's using his own art style.
With his Gaz in
>>124615673 though, that's entirely thrown out the window because for one reason or another, he takes full liberties with her signature "fanged" hairstyle and stylizes it so much more that it's only very vaguely looks like her in-show hairstyle; specifically, only the bottom portion of the "fangs" looks the same, the upper portion is so swept to the side and thicker than usual that it looks like a separate hairstyle was glued to the bottom half of her natural hairstyle. Coupled with retaining no other portions of Invader Zim's art style like the square irises/pupils and having a radically different color palette like
>>124615673 said, I'd say it's much harder to say "that's Gaz", especially when she's got full slampig proportions. I think the only real thing that I could recognize on the spot is MAYBE skull design on the choker, but that's about it. But to be honest I can fap regardless, so it's really just random anon critique on my end.
I don't know why going super-autismo on art style stuff is so satisfying, but it just feels right. At the very least it's more interesting to talk about than 98% of whatever /co/'s bitching about on any given day. If I actually had motivation I'd make some DnD alignment chart of what constitutes as "off-model" in a way that takes after
>>124602546 but I'm a lazy faggit that can't be assed to learn graphic design.
