>>123456946>But in this case, there is nothing wrong with it. Once again, the point stand, you have failed to showcase anything wrong with making diverse content.Except the points I have made. If people prefer to see there own.
That is the logic you have used. Your entire argument was "They CAN do it therefore they SHOULD do it". That was the full extent of your argument.. You just say "It doesn't apply here". And then appeal to blind tribalism, because tribalism is good here even though it's the worst evil ever elsewhere.
I'm starting to think you peopole don't just lack a moral foundation, you lack the concept of a moral foundation.
Lets go through your entire post.
>>123456759>I did: you failed to show anything wrong with it. You failed to establish why it shouldn't be done.You simply say "There is nothing wrong with it".
>But the thing is, there is actually nothing wrong with diversity.You literally say "There is nothing wrong with it", despite my arguments to the contrary (if people enjoy seeing their own people then why don't you apply that concept fully) which you have not addressed in the slightest apart from restating your point over and over like a religious retard chanting mantra. You also completely shifted the argument from the ubiquitous multiracial cast that is demonstratively being pushed for to a far more moderate "rarely represented groups seeing themselves" as if it's not blackify a few of the cast minimum every fucking time (luckily observable in the era of peretual adaption and remakes) you dishonest slimy little prick,.
>You can't force people to make things you want them to do, anon.Shit blurry camera racial slurs women you're a fucking retard etc.
Where the fuck is it? What other logic did you use? Please explain it in as much detail as possible I fucking love finding out how retards process thought.
