>>122348164One example doesn't make rule.
>>122348189The first pictures of Zoe were blurry as fuck. It literally means nothing.
Chloe's betrayal was definitely planned before Season 2 and she had steady build up to it. Of course character like Zoe was planned as well. This character is designed to help authors develop Chloe, not to replace her as it's clear that Chloe is authors' favorite character. They put shitton of effort into her and it's ridiculous to assume that they will suddenly drop it. People claim that authors somehow hate Chloe and did her dirty. To prove that they are bringing moments that were clearly written to make her look sympathetic. It's fucking schizophrenia. One way of escaping from it for them is to claim that authors wrote this moments (which were highlight of the most important episodes in series) "accidentally".
>>122348230I would say it's you who is turbo autist if you think that Zoe would be something more than another prop in Chloe's development.
> you have to be a turbo autist to not see where they wanted to go with her, lolI was pointing that something about Chloe's so called "redemption" was wrong since
>>122347982 scene. Then I analyzed Chloe's behavior and her flashback at "Stormy Weather 2". I was pointing to Chloe's shit behavior in "Startrain" and then "Miraculer" happened and all fucking fandom celebrated Chloe being "redeemed" in it while for me it looked exactly the opposite. I wont claim that I predicted Chloe's betrayal. I fully expected her to be proclaimed as hero after what she did. My expectations was based more on meta reasons than on Chloe's actual progress.
So yeah, authors were going with this betrayal thing from the start and signs pointing to it were all over the place but people were just blinded by how the show licked Chloe's ass at every occasion in effort to make her more sympathetic while it was clear that she doesn't deserve this sympathy. Yeah, it sounds a bit autistic because I am already a bit tired
