>>121731614>but so how it feels lazier and less professional than others,It probably isn't, it's just another example of meh.
It has a lot of issues.
>fat, dominant businessman... but daintily holding champagne instead of a fat cigar>no usage of visual metaphors>"immorally low" who the fuck on minimum wage says that?I think the artist tried more on using good colour composition than trying to make something worth paying for.
>>121731939>surely there must be a way to reconcile and slowly fix things over timeIf you consider that large scale suffrage is relatively young (~200 years old for wealth based in the most progressive European countries, ~100 years old for wealth based women's suffrage in progressive countries, and less time still for one man/woman one vote), we're still in the process of "slowly fixing" things to be less painful for everyone.
One thing you could look at is how long ago your country stopped your landlord from seeing who you vote for, and then realise how many political and media elites would have been able to tell you how to vote on threat of being kicked out if that was never changed (I imagine your country is like mine where a substantial amount of the middle classes are landlords).
