>>121279920>Youre a fucking idiot if you just flat out deny sex negative feminism
Yeah I'm not the one saying sex negative feminism doesn't exist, you're the one saying sex positive feminism doesn't exist when being directly presented with evidence in the form of widespread sex positive feminist events. And yes, sex positive feminism is the norm now, hence why OnlyFans, premium snapchats, and all other forms of e-thottery are now commonplace for young women and you will be called a sexist for suggesting this is a bad thing. I don't understand what joy you get from arguing on the behalf of braindead feminist whores while pretending to be some anti-feminist. You're basically only opposed to the 19th century idea of feminism while entirely supporting of the more modern third/fourth wave feminism to the point where you're basically screeching "DURRRRR THAT'S NOT REAL FEMINISM" because you don't want to admit to sharing the views of retarded feminists.
Come clean, are you unironically a woman?