>>120548090>dictatorWho said anything about a dictator?
>Yes and that is why you keep pushing retard.I'll give you an example, anon; a nice little two dimensional example.
Let's say we're on babies first political representation chart, a 2d plane,with axis "orange-purple" and "square-circle". Lets say we're at (0,0), and I want to be at, I don't know, (0.5,1); Slightly towards orange and more towards squares.
There's two parties; one is aiming for (0.5,-1.5); they want just as much orange as me, but they want a LOT of circles. The other party is aiming for (-0.5,0); they want a little bit more purple, and they want to keep the square-circle status quo.
The first party is in my direction for orange-purple, and significantly away from it for square-circle.
The second party is slightly away in my direction for orange-purple, and stays where it is for square-circle.
The first party, even though it's moving in the same "direction" as me for one issue, puts me much farther away than the second party would. In fact, the first party is arguably moving more "away" from me than the second party, in terms of angle.
This is just a simple 2d example, so extrapolate this up to where there's 3, 5, 10, a hundred separate axis with different political groups clustered differently.
The point being that, if the dems dropped the ridiculous 5% of their base that is progressive freaks, I'd probably be blue for the rest of my life. As it stands, though, their focus on that one segment, and its effect on overall policy, unironically makes the GO-fucking-P a lesser evil, and I absolutely hate that it's this way.
