>>120367976Aren't you that TERF from a previous /co/ boys thread on this board?
If that's the case, then it's slightly odd that we have such similar ideas of attractive.
And by fetish, I wasn't talking IRL. It's 2D supremacy, here, anon. I meant for the viewer and the artist. The drawing doesn't choose how it looks. Unless, of course, we have a Frankendoodle situation.
But yeah, I really don't care for the hentai where an artist take a girl design and the characters says they totally identify as male without them having the slightest bit of maleness to the personality. It's not a fetish I have, so it's frustrating. They're drawing what is in their minds effectively a hot flat-chested anime girl, so why not just make that? I know that it's a turn-on for them, so I get it, but as someone with somewhat particular preferences, it can be a little frustrating
>>120367934>heternormative, caring shy guy (who dresses in simple clothing without overthinking it) which is the actual bestGotta agree. I think guys should be able to dress and act however they want, no matter how Dad-like or feminine. But it's just that I tend to trend more towards the "Dad" side of things, bonerwise. There are some exceptions, though.
I gotta say, though, what I personally find the best 2D and to some extent 3D are the types with a slight sort of averageness, like, not feeling the need to look nice, but not outright slobbishness, although that's not necessarily a turn-off either. It's kinda hard to explain. It's not humility, and it's not shyness. I don't know what it is.
I'm one of those people who think Jaden Animations' avatar is oddly fuckable, and the appeal to me is something similar to what I'm describing above.
Oh, and what I like to think about is taking guy or girl characters who don't know how to dress and having another character who dresses very well use them as like a living, moving doll. A little girl's fantasy, I know, but I like the idea of embarrassing them slightly.
