>>119343209>Then we can agreeI don't agree, but you can delude yourself all you want.
>This is your brain on pre-2000 animation. LT was WB's cow and had people developing new animated techniquesNot relevant to what I said.
>So it's a bias and a very pathetic oneAn opinion you don't like.
>Beginners artists sure as fuck can't work with the same ammount of details and colors. SU backgrounds have lack of detail, i will admit it has a lot of colors, but anyone could just open up a color palet and just plaster different shades of colors in the BG, so no biggie.
>I would trust your opinion if you didn't get the bias that's with "anyone could draw this", you have just no argument and I doubt you can even draw something like thisYou wouldn't trust anything I say regardless because you don't like what i'm saying about the stupid cartoon you like
>you have just no argument and I doubt you can even draw something like this"hurr you need to draw like this in order to critique it durr"
lmao, typical response. Guess thats why so many animators and american "artists" are so soft now a days because they can't take an ounce of criticism lightly.
>Those are supposed to be the shades of both light and shadow.YEAH SUUUUUUURE LOL
>Then why are you still here? Just for shilling yourself?I'm here because the attenion i'm getting is delicious also you don't what "shilling" means.
>This is supposed to be a circlejerk thread of cute and comfy pics, not art criticism the threadTough shit. I'm critiquing anyway wheter you like it or not.
>Then don't get angry if someone asks you why are you still here.???
>>119343230>Like you're hating here because they find the style cute.I'm here because it's easy to rumble SUfags' fethers, and it's working pretty well. Thanks for the (You)s, this is fun.
>>119345303>Okay, so whip up a Steven Universe style background. If anyone can do it.>>"LET'S SEE YOU DO A BETTER JOB FAGGIT!"Typical response, also seethe
