>>118487443No, I think people are attracted to people. I didn't say people are attracted to pronouns. Not sure where you are getting that from. If you mean that I think cis people are attracted to trans people, that is correct. Most trans women date straight cis men. Most trans men date straight cis women.
>>118487450 I guess I just assume that if you like sex you'd go out of your way to learn something about it. But you know feel free to stick to missionary with the lights off. One day you'll graduate to girl on top if your fragile masculinity doesn't think that's too gay too.
>>118487508I didn't say you needed to be attracted to a penis. Of any kind. I am saying that some people you are attracted to may have a penis. It's kind of on you if that's some sort of hangup.
>>118487519I get how it can feel that way to a cis person. The fact is that there is a large section of people who are so insecure with thier own gender that they make it dangerous for trans people to exist. That's why there's the big cultural push towards acceptance. In what way are trans people as a whole in any way trying to change your autonomy? People like this person
>>118487704 make understanding what trans people go through an important aspect of destigmatization. I know it can be uncomfortable to learn about someone who has different experiences than you, but it doesn't compare to the level of discomfort trans people face when met with bigotry.
>>118487778Ok, you are conflating sex and gender. That is not in line with the current science. We used to think of them as the same thing and as binary, but we learned new things and discovered that trans people have been around for as long as humans have. It's not a new trend, it's a new level of acceptance that you are seeing. If you are one of those guys who is claiming to know more than the social scientists who study this for a living, why should I believe you, over actual experts in the topic?
