>>118101598is it just one union shitting on another union?
or the union shitting on a nonunion project?
whos the outgroup supposed to be? i dont believe for a minute that this is some principled stand against john k when
1. the industry has bent over backwards to defend others accused of the same crime and
2, even when/if those people were kicked out, the projects would continue because it was 'unfair to punish the whole team for the crimes of one person'