>>118103049False equivalence.
are you underage? our current model about how science works is called falsifiability and states that we will never know at 100% about anything but only about what's more likely or unlikely about something.
it doesn't mean that everything we know is useless but only that with enough effort and ways of proving something "wrong" (applying empiricism and pragmatism) whatever we find will be so close to "true" that is indistinguishable from it.
>>118103076again that's a mistake and a completely straw man the pillars of modern physics describe its respective area of inquiry — the very smallest and the most massive things in the cosmos — with astounding accuracy and it's highly unlikely to change even with a "theory of everything."
also Quantum mechanics successfully implemented the Standard Model so that's not going to change much that's not how theories work.
it's like evolution we know that evolution is a fact and that still happens, population genetics and Quantative genetics describe accurately
our current understanding about it but doesn't describe everything even so that does not mean that we're going to thrown everything just because you're just naive.
