>>117051067>A good decision. Yes it means some people from his kingdom will die but it helps form an alliance with another kingdom that can payoff in the future.Tell that to the people that starve, cunt. You don't get to make that kind of decision for others like you're playing a dank game of Crusader Kings then proclaim you're the local bastion of morality.
>They had all the prep they needed according to Viren.>You can trust Viren>But you can't trust Viren!Pick one you shitpiper
>Admittedly a short-sighted decision but ultimately he is a compassionate king so it makes sense for his character.Yeah it makes sense but it doesn't mean he's not to blame.
>The only reason he did is because Viren tore open that wound and drove a nail right into it. Harrow was fine with leaving good enough alone.You mean how the first thing Harrow did when the option came up was basically knock the table over with his erection and go 'So I can gank that scaly fucker? God I hate that McMotherfucker'
Pretending it wasn't a mutual agreement and that Viren totes manipulated him rather than giving him a chance to do something he already wanted is a crock and you know it you slut.
>*coward's optionOh sure, meanwhile having dozens of his men die then leaving his Jellytart monster of a son that knows somewhere between fuck and all about leadership to fuck the Kingdom up was woke, brave and empowered.
>Viren goaded him into most of the decisions retard.And yet he could've still said no couldn't he? The power lay with him and if he thought it was a retarded idea it was up to him to say no.
No one else can do that for him.
But he didn't, he say 'Fuck yes' except for when Viren on the rare occasion suggested something sensible like leaving the wounded behind.
Still, go on, tell me how Harrow had no moral onus of his own, he was 100% a helpless puppet being pulled along by Viren on his strings despite being the most powerful person in the kingdom.
You stonking great big retard.
