>>116501930>Lazy writing Y'know what? Yeah. It's just trying to be a goofy comedy and not take itself too seriously.
>Same tired style every CN toon in the last 5 years has used Not even true. "Bean mouths" and protruding cheek silhouettes are only minor details that make up these shows' art styles. Roar feels like a marriage between vintage '70s cartoons (think 'Schoolhouse Rock!') and Rubber House's work:
https://www.rubberhousestudio.com/ >Reboot that shits on whatever the original was going for It's actually still pretty faithful to the original series, pulling from past characters and episode concepts and then putting their own comedic spin on it, all while retaining an adventurous spirit underneath it all. If anything, the fight scenes help Roar live up to its name alongside the other two iterations.
>you might as well have made something original to begin with Victor literally tried that with Cartoon Network Studios a couple years prior to pitching his ThunderCats reboot to Warner Bros. Animation:
https://twitter.com/cartoonnetwork/status/811551795851894784 >Shitty character designs They're really not that bad, but they could definitely be better.
>Background art is the only passable thing I actually feel that background art is one of the less impressive aspects of the show, but it still does its job well enough.
