>>115037262>>115037175The problem is, naming a show isn't giving an example. Listing off a show where a woman is in the lead position usually reserved for men *also* isn't an example. Lifting up one gender isn't de-facto lowering the other.
99% of "examples" are also just generally bad writing, that would be bad writing regardless of which gender is in what role, but because the female as opposed to the male is in the lead, suddenly that's the reason why, whether or not it makes sense.
