>>114905210>, but the reason that same gender abuse is less common is because of the lack of gender roles in that kind of relationship.Again, lesbians have the highest rate of abuse. Period. Bisexual men and women both report lower ratss, by far.
You're saying this in stark contrast to reality, and the only thing you've posted in defense of this dumb idea is a flawed argument about how lesbians report being abused by men at some point in their lives, which does not factor into statistics from either crime database reports, abuse shelters, or hotlines because all of those focus on who they are with AT THE TIME. As in, who they are currently with. If a lesbian reported that her current partner, who was a male, abused her, she gets filed under "Bisexual" because there is no report anywhere that contains "Pansexual", as it is either so negligible it wouldn't matter or they just plain don't recognize it.
Before you mention transsexuals, they are also a statistically negligible part of the population, reports on them in regards to abuse statistics are so low they have to have their own specific set when being tallied. Despite what some people tell you, there's less than .001 percent of any given population that identifies as transsexual.
Women have less reason to fear their partners fighting back either physically or emotionally in lesbian relationships, and as a result there is a clear correlation with both physical and emotional abuse and relationships of this nature. That's why the rate of emotional abuse for men with female partners is freakishly high, but physical abuse is much lower. Your idea about entitled beliefs is a flawed idea that has no metric in any research that can back it up.
