>>114581946Ah I see. I think that word carries critical weight because when discussing people's awkward "alternative" behaviour, these people often brush off criticism by simply saying that's part of who they are because they are weird like it's a badge of honour, thus using "quirky" carries extra punch because it's a weird term for "weird".
But I get what you mean, it's oft overused for negative criticism that I doubt many would use it as just a general descriptor. I suppose a better way to convey my feelings would be to say: she seems to lack an actual humorous personality, and tries to make up for it by giving off a pretence of being "awkward": she doesn't just not read books like most, she doesn't because of her awkward history with books; she calls a comic a "book", it's not even a mature comic but a comic for children; it's all so awkward.
She lacks personality and seemingly maturity, and uses a cheap veneer to gloss over it, whether you call it "quirkiness" or "awkwardness", it's all the same.
But you were right before, I can not like it and it's perfectly fine for you to like it regardless, however looking at something critically as to why or why not you like something I think is important. Don't just eat whatever your given anon.
