Patreon violates artists' freedom of speech
No.113662118 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>113662241 >>113662293 >>113662322 >>113662367 >>113662423 >>113662605 >>113662651 >>113662740 >>113662830 >>113662938 >>113663013 >>113663029 >>113663032 >>113663186 >>113663200 >>113663293 >>113663364 >>113663631 >>113663745 >>113663926 >>113663947 >>113664361 >>113664906 >>113664932 >>113665278 >>113665353 >>113665494 >>113665540 >>113665900 >>113665908 >>113666430 >>113666462 >>113669217 >>113671299 >>113673207 >>113674365 >>113674428 >>113674552 >>113674713 >>113675243 >>113675400 >>113675832 >>113675874 >>113675884 >>113675894 >>113676189 >>113676349 >>113676602 >>113677033 >>113677334 >>113678528 >>113678548 >>113678648
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/564/996/1407869/
Judge James E. Gritzner ruled in United States v. Handley that two parts of the PROTECT Act of 2003 criminalizing "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting" was unconstitutional.
Why does Patreon violate artists' freedom of speech and intellectual property rights?
Patreon has no right to tell an artist their adult character is not an adult.
Judge James E. Gritzner ruled in United States v. Handley that two parts of the PROTECT Act of 2003 criminalizing "a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting" was unconstitutional.
Why does Patreon violate artists' freedom of speech and intellectual property rights?
Patreon has no right to tell an artist their adult character is not an adult.
