>>113606016>Please, as if anyone here actually cares if it’s safe or not.I literally just told you that's my concern.
One of my best friends is transexual and rushing a "solution" to market could have had serious negative effects to her health.>It’s all about keeping those undesirables out of sight and mind.Please stop being a professional martyr.
>You don’t see anyone here saying ban soda when it kills more kids by the thousandsA. We know damn well what the effects of soft drink consumption are, there's no need to take time and test that.
B. We don't know how many more kids it theoretically could/couldn't harm yet. That's the point of testing before distribution.
C. You're comparing the negative effects of the overconsumption of a commodity to prescribing drugs that were designed for an anomaly, not the average child.
Unless you've got some damn convincing evidence for me, this isn't something that should be considered a viable solution at present. 10-20 years from now with some solid data suggesting no repercussions for kids with normal or already delayed pubescence? Sure. Honestly it could actually be a good thing universally, depending. But until then it's not something that should be brought up as if it's currently on the table.
PS please stop being a presumptuous, beleaguered cunt. Yo can't read minds. Not everyone conforms to you expectations. You should know better.
