>>113546275there's a bit of a sliding scale. Cartoons from the 20s to 50s are good because, for the most part, they didn't try to cheap out.
then, cartoons became "mass-produced" for television, the Hanna-Barbera/Filmation model of limited animation on a low budget, relying on dialogue and recycling cels and footage to pad things out.. only starting to spend money again when they were selling action figures. but all this stuff was competing with 1940s Looney Tunes reruns showing all the kids what animation could be.
Tiny Toons must have looked like a fucking renaissance, WB returning to form. well, it wasn't quite 1940s WB, but it wasn't He-Man either.
>let Orko talk, we don't even have to lip-sync him.nor was it the pop culture circle jerk that Animaniacs became... but the whole Kids WB lineup from that period had this voice to it... hard to explain. but it's like every show in its 1995 lineup was meant for a different kind of misfit kid.
