>>113426884I do my part and report every screencap thread I see, unless it's just an announcement on social media or something along those lines.
/v/ is absolutely awful with those threads, but the good news is that mods usually give at least half of a fuck to delete them if they're obviously excuses for shitflinging and wouldn't even make for a fun off-topic thread. Not to call mods competent, its just great to see the bare minimum of moderation compared to how this board handles it.
I've checked up on /co/ about twice the past few weeks, and I've seen four threads on that Mike Wazowski looking chick in that new Pixar movie. Not discussing the movie or Pixar's overall library, just discussion on how much they hate dykes, statistic posting, all of that. Bump limit, every single time.
>>113426881I've never checked out /lit/ myself. All I know about it is that saga of the book reviewer getting scared off of the internet by weird anons on the board sending pictures of their piss jars to her.
