>>113304427I'm really getting tired of
>X is based because they take risks!being said like it has any substance, risk taking isn't an inherent virtue. Money, time and effort going into uncertain things doesn't mean those things are good or "better" than safer expenses or a lot of Kickstarters and Patreons clearly just fucking about with funds would be default creative geniuses according to you.
Furthermore I find it puzzling the same people who cheer the idea of actual risk taking seem in the same breath to lament the existence of actual consequences. It's called a risk to begin with because failure is possible, how someone who takes or likes risks can fail to accept failure is beyond me, yet I always see them among the first and most frequent to cry up and down about how "IT'S NOT FAIR!".
I hate the avalanche of Batman shit as much as anyone else, but I'm not going to mindlessly clap at whatever D list title gets half-heartedly resurrected for nostalgia cred or intent to revamp it into something modern and atrocious or the distinct possibility the people behind what gets put to print are probably just throwing darts at a board with no real thought since their top titles are carrying them anyway and they just need filler during the weeks they're not out.
Also
>We probably won't see much of that anymore.Enough with this second layer of horseshit as well, there's no evidence to substantiate the removal of one ""risk" taker" means everything and everyone thereon will be "safe" and we'll regret our betrayal, and should APOLOGIZE and bla bla with the usual doomsaying.
All that said Johns and Lee should have got the boot too. In fact I'm tired of all these fuck ups having shit slide off so long. Snyder, King, Bendis, Aaron, Slott, Cates all need ejection seats installed at their desks. I don't even want new blood or old blood, I just want these bloated leeches sustaining themselves off position, title recognition, sales gimmicks or connections removed!