>>113046289Oh please, you can't really use this 2012 comic book costumes argument.
Objectification it's not being sexy.
People can wear anything they wants as long as they're making the choice.
The right moment they aren't and they just wear something another person who is not them it's objectification
>>113046316>Christian purism in 2020this world is a mistake
>>113046457but making "sexy" fanarts of irl people is wrong. Nothing stop you from jerking off from a a porn, because the people who make porn agreed on it, people in fanarts didn't
>>113046436Twitter thinks it's okay as long as are the right people, and it's not like that. Nobody deserves it, nobody deserves that kind of mockery
>>113046374>>113046484>>113046525That's not how it works and you know it very well.
Sexualization doesn't mean beautiful. Fetishization comes for society viewed beautiful and ugly people.
So if they need to be sexy for not being ugly then nothing will change, they would still be viewed as nothing but an object instead of real people
