>>112391609Not him. Think for a minute about your position. You are naturally more embarrassed by fatshit because it is your fetish and it 'gets you' a little regardless of whether or not it's aimed at sexually titillating you. To a normie, however, shit like
>>112376994 can fly easy because it's so far from a normie's conception of erotic, it's just "LMAO fat people amirite?". However, most of us fetish idiots have our minds too clouded by fucking coom to realize the acceptable boundaries of this sort of thing, seeing all depictions of fat and the like as mildly erotic.
Of course, the problem we're seeing more of today, or at least on 4chan, is that more people are basically fucking wearing their fetishes on their sleeves, talking about said goofy cartoon shit that woke up their fetishes while they were young, etc. etc, which is probably making (you) even more self-conscious. You in fact would need to exercise caution with some of this fatshit because normies may be becoming more sensitive to it in general, but I'd reckon you could get away with looking at very very small doses of fatshit in public if it wasn't erotic- though how sensitive those around you are to these fetishes will play a role in how easily you can go undetected.
I wish we could fucking go back.
