>>112251402Anon they are incompatible statements
>A person can not decide what sex they are attracted too and it would be cruel to try and change that.Is the core statement behind all gay rights, all of my rights you ignorant tumbler tranny bi slut
The next statement
>Gender is a social construct of expected social expressions and behaviors, concentrated in clothing, mannerisms, and life style choices. Runs right fucking into reality cause you could put on a puffy coat, wear a fake beard, and get introduced as Mr tumbler fag, but that still wouldn't make me want to fuck you. If gender is mutable than all sexuality is mutable. If sexual attraction can have a binary then gender must have a strict component, but if it doesn't it's as meaningless an idea as your existence. It's not incomparable yet though, just demeaning in one way or the other. If you accept a statement like.
>Gender is a social construct, but sexual characteristics are concrete things, with a limited number of mutations in the middle. In which case you have reduced everyone to an organ fetishist, with the exception of pansexuals who finally justify their existence. Or you could accept something like.
>Gender is a social construct, but sex is determined by chromosomes and controls various factors.In which case you also have to accept trans people will never truly be the sex they want to be only the gender.
But let's say those two statements are undesirable to you, let's say you make sex as mutable choseable, and irrelevant as gender. Well now every sexuality loses its meaning cause it's standards become subjective. Trans rights are incompatible with gay rights.
