>>111850849>It was never the classic you prop it up to be.Now you're simply creating a false narrative to suit the strawman you've created.
>My point is Fairly Odd Parents sucks. It lasted too long.It lasted as long as it did because people enjoyed it, it was a clever show and the longevity of it proves it. So that assumption you've made is false and is simply conjecture on your part. You have a very subjective mindset that is akin to a young child's mind. You seem to believe that if you don't like something then that means that everyone must also dislike it. This is known as a subjective mindset and is a sign of an indolent person.
>All the running gags dried up by season 3.You're making arbitrary blanket statements again without providing evidence of your claim. If you're not going to explain your viewpoint it tells me that you didn't believe it to begin with.
>Butch was so starved for ideas he introduced shitty concepts like a baby character, a dog character, and a new girl, while forgetting previous main characters like Vicky or Chester.There is nothing wrong with introducing new characters to expand the story line. If you didn't like it then that's your own prerogative but it's disingenuous to imply that your subjective view on the direction of the show is objective. Learn to separate the two views.
>Even when this show was good, it was only about as good as post-Dil Rugrats or Disney's Doug.You keep going back to this subjective mindset. Your beliefs are not majority so I'd ask you to take a step back and figure out which views you have are based on nostalgia with a aversion to change, and which are based on solid facts. Your opinion is definitely leaning on the minority viewpoint as of right now.
