>>111807750Most cartoon designs, like from anything ever, look better than Wabbit. Other than that I do think the specific poses/character designs shown in the OP look kinda weird and maybe not the best way to represent the shorts, since it feels like most images I've seen that are actually FROM them look better than that.
For example this
>>111808043 looks pretty fucking great, and if that's actually representative of the typical quality of these shorts then I don't have anything to complain about. I'm also interested in just how much the art/designs might diverge depending on who's involved.
