>>111826249>SpidermanSpider-man. Use the hyphen, dicksneeze.
>Not in any modern form. Not ever.Ultimate Spider-Man sold more than Amazing for a great part of the 2000s. Most of the time, it sold more than Batman. You can check yourself at
Comichron.com, instead of embarassing yourself over and over.
>Cool adult PeterPeter isn't a cool adult. He's a square dork.
>Swinging single Peter and teen Peter were unpopularI've already annihilated the "teen Pete was unpopular" supposition, so let's look at swinging single Peter. Was he actually unpopular?
Attached is a pic of Spider-Man's sales position in 1969, 18 years before the marriage. (Data is spotty from there until the Diamond Comics domination). Looks like he was pretty far from unpopular!
>Married Peter was his most popular!This is basically conjecture on your part. Comics data comparisons are impossible.
However, Far From Home and ASM2 earned the most money, ASM 2 was in theaters longer than any other spider-man, and, well, even the Raimi series doesn't feature married Peter. The only one to feature a marriage-aged Peter is the lowest performing one of all, Spider-Verse. Of course,it features divorced Peter, so that does support your hypothesis somewhat.
>You're a furious unfucked cuntYou're sad, uninteresting and lazy and I'm styling on your ignorance to make a point. You are having an argument with a strawman you are pretending represents me and you're *still* demonstrably wrong about everything you say.
>>111826272They are wildly better than people who use this as an argument typically believe.
Unit sales are flat but not declining and dollar amounts are up. This is a thing you could know yourself if you bothered to check Comichron.
