>>111474030From puerly theological standpoint:
>Ad 1&2Yes, there is free will. No apple, or rather act of eating it (which in itself prooves that free will is a thing that even this fuckboy Calvin got), didn't do anything to free will. Or rather it did - it weaken it, and make passions (raughly emotions) not a subject of it.
>Ad 3Jesus was perfect man from the instant of Mary's fiat. His human will was always in perfect unity with his Divine Will. As for this courious passagee about child Christ in gospel of Luke - it a bit complicated. Jesus could acces his Divine powers to do stuff such as speaking, but human do not work like that, so it was fitting for our sake to "learn" stuff on human level. He of course was perfect in his learning.
>Ad 4Of parents of Antichrist we know not much. Some Fathers say that father would be a bishop or priest, and that mother a nun. That father might be a Turk, and we know that Antichrist shall be a Jew from the line of Dan, so either one of them will be jewish. As for thier scumity level we know nothing, though chance of them being Satanist are more than high.
>Ad 5Satan was not radical who wanted control his own destiny (Alinsky you fuck) he was a selfabsorbed powerhungry dick, who though that since he is greatest of angels, he shall take place of God as Most High. Some also say that he was really fucking pissed that Mary would take his place as the "greatest creation" her being mother of God. But Michael btfo him so much that he is salty ever since.
Antichrist would not be half-human. Demons are Angels, and Angles don't have bodies. He shall be human, possesed from the conception, with will perfectly united to will of Satan, a perfect instrument of evil.
>Ad Antichrists shall, are, and were many. THE Antichrist? One. And he ain't around before his conception, Origen was wrong about that.
