>>111414921>bad for not following a template There's a difference between template and the definition of things and what a structure is.
>said template only exists because II? Me? You're the one who said that this was an arc. And I'm not the one who made this template. There are literally a thousand other images, books, analysis, and acedemic works published by scholars that back this. It does not exist because I tell people to follow it.
You made a claim about this being an arc. I debunked your claim using what people define as an arc. This webcomics is not some masterwork of story telling or unconventional in a good way in the SLIGHTEST. It is not innovative remotely in the way it tells its story. In fact parts of it follow this exact narrative structure. There is a reason these threads keep dying and people are dropping this comic besides hiatuses. We have been stuck in exposition for three years. The fact that you're a dessenting opinion to the tons of people who complain about it doesn't mean there isn't a problem.
You have no right to call me dim when you can't even make a functional sentence in your green text.
