>>111137075>>111153040Oh, that's different, then.
In that case, we take the 489 million women of working age, assume that both of her figures are real, which means they all get an equivalent of 50% of the average wage for one week. (If we assume it's 25% less across the board, their average would be 75% of the average pay, and having them make "25% more than men" would be 125% the average pay)
So, the average pay for a month is $148, which means the average for a week is $37.
She gave each woman a total of $18.5, which would add up to a total of $9 billion, or 2.76 B stolen from each of the 25 top-earning people in India (Assuming she stole it equally).
So, probably very doable, but really more symbolic than very useful.
