>>110253918Honestly, I'm embarrasingly sensitive to this kind of thing and that doesn't sound that sexist to me.
It's not like it's making a statement about all men or all women, it's just a singular scenario.
It's pretty normal for commercials to have a hero woman for the intended demographic to identify with.
Now if it showed a montage of men everywhere not being able to figuren it out, and the implied message was "only women can figure this out, so buy it and you're getting one over on the icky boys" then I would find it sexist. And even then, it would only be offensive if it was An existing non-gendered product.
