>>109575348>False. Mixing different kinds of DNA ups the chances of positive mutations and the inheritance of positive genesWhich is accomplished via crossing over during meiosis. Perfectly capable of being performed by members of an isolated population.
>Which is why people is attracted to "exotic" foreigners.Most people aren't. Most people strongly prefer pursuing relationships among members of the same group. Dating app data makes this crystal clear. Considering that in-group members are more likely to have similar genetics, and genetics are the units of inheritance that evolution acts on, this is exactly as expected.
>a mixture of different eapecies is what created the homo sapiens and allowed us to thrive.Runaway selection for intelligence is what allowed Homo sapiens to thrive. Different modern populations have different admixtures of different non-sapiens groups, not all of which seem to be beneficial. And once sapiens came along, the modern subspecies drove all others to extinction.
>Then why is Japan the poster child for fertility problems?Because the traditional relationships between men and women have broken down, with no effective model to replace them.
>What the fuck are you even on about. It should be obvious that the people of the future will descend from the people who have children. If groups don't propagate themselves, they are replaced by groups that do. Reproduction matters because it determines who passes on their culture, ideology, and genetics.
>Base instincts are not necessarily positive.We're talking about reproduction here. Do you seriously not understand how societies are maintained or how evolution works?
>Culture is not an immovable thing and it has never been.Naturally, which is why most cultures are destroyed rather quickly. Successful cultures find certain things that work, and then sustain them long enough to bear productive rewards. When they lose the practices that enabled their success, they fail and are replaced.
