>>109095940>You think this is some "gatcha" moment
I'm not trying to "get you". I'm trying to explain it to you in incredibly simple terms, since you don't even seem to understand the reasons why you believe what you do.>You've given me NOTHING but your fucking word
Because you're the one making the claim that police corruption is a massive problem.>after I've given you links.
That, consequently, do the opposite of show that it's a massive problem; that it only exists as exceptional fringe cases.>Imagine what ISN'T caught.
Now you're being even more silly. Not only do your links not show that police corruption is a massive problem, but are you seriously going to argue "but it's invisible!"?>start thinking beyond what pasta you read here.
I'm not even sure what pasta you're referring to. I don't believe that there's a massive police corruption conspiracy ruining the country, because there's no evidence to indicate such.>Your challenging me on the basis of wanting positive change in my country's policing
No, I'm challenging you on the basis of why you believe what you believe, because you unironically only believe what you do because of shitty propaganda you hear blaring from the MSM all day.
That is no way to go through life. The media does not exist to inform you, as most people have realized by now. When watching anything from any political orientation, you should at least ask yourself the basics:
1. What are they trying to get me to believe?
2. What facts are they selectively including to shape their narrative?
3. What are they intentionally leaving out?
4. Why is this being reported on in the first place?