>>109064191>You don't think that's a bit of a conspiracy?I'd call it a conspiracy if it wasn't very easy to find statements by these people declaring that to be their intention
>They add non white characters because doing so will undermine the influence and power of white people because they have a fetish for seeing that?They add non white characters because they're relativists and functionalists. Depicting history accurately for the sake of how interesting and unique it is matters less to them than making it comfortable and reflect the modern world with the modern values of diversity and inclusion, since they themselves see it as their mission to promote their ideas, they think that by passing this erroneous interpretation of history as real(tactitly or otherwise, these are productions made by the BBC) they can inculcate them into society more effectively by faking a historical continuity of these values and weaving them into people's cultural heritage. History is only a tool to utilize for social engineering.
There's of course inherent harmful repercusions to disrespecting peoples' heritage, from the erosion of cultural cohesion to driving people to more extreme and hardline positions. The resurgence of white supremacism is entirely due to the fact that whites have progressively lost their connection to a common unifying identity so they have begun seeking a new one contrasting other groups' racial ones.
