>>108954081The top version is stupid and pointless, but the bottom one is even more unnecessary and pointless. We already have a stylized cartoony version, we don’t need a CG version that is the same.
We don’t need a realistic version either, of course, but at least you can make an argument that it’s slightly different for being less cartoonish and stylized, and maybe could conceivably have some appeal to someone with that weird preference.
