>>108615473Here let me give you a play by play because you didnt pass the third grade.
OP posts his post:
>>108609937Okay.
I post a reply, stating i disliked the design being a Mysterio design because i felt it didnt really understand the character:
>>108610174Faggot immediately jumps to calling the original design a dated reference
>>108612152 to try and prove why i'm wrong, claiming its still true to the idea.
I reply:
>>108612177I ask what he even means by it being dated, a reference, and point out it still works fine today, because it does. I also point out that looking like a stage magicidian doesnt really fit his character, he worked in blockbuster movies as a VFX artist, he wasnt someone who pulled rabbits out of a hat.
He replies, incapable of reading fucking english, with
>>108612209 somehow equating what i said to me saying Mysterio dresses like a VFX engineer, and not getting the point i just made.
I point out:
>>108612268 That he, again, doesnt do stage magician parlour tricks, his gimmick is much more grandiose and "mystical" than that, and the point of me bringing up him being a VFX engineer
This guy still misses the fucking point:
>>108612296 and doesnt understand the difference between Mysterios aesthetic vs a stage magician
Blah blah blah he starts making shit up:
>>108612567 >>108612684, calls him dated again, doesnt really explain what that even means again,
Again, try to point out the idea behind his design and why a stage magician isnt really fitting
>>108612760Eventually he tries to snipe me having gave up trying to put forward an actual argument, so i type out a long one:
>>108613130explaining in detail my point
He proceeds to sperg out at having to read more than 10 words in succession, and refuses to read my argument so he can keep shitposting at me:
>>108613157 >>108613183 >>108613230 >>108613321Oh but poor bitch babies cant handle naughty boo boo words its mean.
