>>108379782Not at all, since he's evolved consistently to reflect American ideals at the time, instead of staying statically representative of WWII era ideals.
It would have been weird if during the 60's, he remained as a very traditional character who still represented the status quo while civil rights issues were at the forefront of American politics and change was in the air, but he evolved to adjust to the new way of thinking.
It would have been weird if during the 70's during a time of immense dissatisfaction with the American government and protest against war, he continued to represent the military and answer to the president, but he evolved to reflect an American ideal that transcended politics and was concerned with people.
It would have been weird if during the 80's when people were at each other's throats over partisan politics, he took a stance on either side of the fence, but he evolved and came to be about free speech, exchange of ideas and cooperation.
And in the post-9/11 nationalistic fervor, it would have been weird if he took an aggressive stance against foreigners, but instead he fought corrupt government and corporations, domestic terrorism and Neo-Nazis as well as foreign terrorists, while making speeches about the arrogance of meddling in foreign affairs.
