>>108269660>Did you not read the link where it showed police shootings of a black get 100 times the coverage of shootings of whites?That does not back the claim "White get the same ratio of police shooting as white".
>But it didn't "make the news", it has barely 1% of the coverage of similar cases with blacks involved.One of the reason the black shooting get much more coverage is because much more people argue whether or not the police was "in the right". whereas there, most consider it's a clear and cut case, the police being in the wrong. Less controversy means less reference in the news.
You are not making a point there.
More coverage means, more arguing if the black person deserved to be shot.
>Do you guys seriously not know how to read?Do you? you provided a link about media coverage to a statement saying you were false saying Police shot white with the same ratio.
