>>108159197>Facebook, basically. I'll dig it up if I can find it
There you go, the fact that you have to spend minutes to find a facebook post containing such a lexicon is telling>but I would also admit people shove those terms in normal conversation
Again its not, for all of your /pol/ bitching, not once does those terms are normal in day to day interaction, especially when you're about to ask someone on a date.>I don't even live in America
Then you'll also know that what you're saying is simply not true since even in America you'll have a hard time finding the context where such a word is normal in everyday conversation.>Do you happen to be retarded? You just proved yourself wrong. Hate being founded on disagreement is not hate=disagreement
By god you really are retarded, your entire argument can be easily dismissed by aasking what you hate and I can point out exactly which part you disagreed with.>Uh, yes? Just like how people work retarded shit like trumptards or libtards in conversations. Or shit like capitalism, socialism etc. Never had relatives come over?
Do you just equate trumptard and libtard with socialism and capitalism because one is rarely used in conversation and another one is common when you bring up anything relating to politics, economics, history, etc. See this is the problem with you libtard, you see a figure of crime rate between races and you deduced that all human are the same since we all commit crime never looking at the fact that different races have different tendencies.>Why would you care about that in a normal conversation?
Shit man, this is your point in the first place. A normal dating conversation does not contain obscure words like old gender words at all. Jesus Christ just watch any romantic TV series you dolt.>And now apparently libtards don't count as normal people, so their conversations don't count, and thus conversations using the word old gender roles don't exist.
Absolutely correct on all front,