>>108015553>You already did that comparing it to bitcoin.
Not him, but no, he didn't use the fallacy like you did. He included another detail from the author of the "comic", so to remember that he was proven wrong, and he might proven wrong again soon or not.
That's not the meaning of straw-man, dude. He didn't at any once distort any of your posts and make you look worse, contrary to you, which you just did to him. Great job, champion.