>>107645972cont
Furthermore, a common argument against pro "life" is, rather, not an argument but a retort. It typically goes something like "if you care so much about my kid than why don't you adopt more." This is a somewhat valid response to the general dilemma, and it highlights an issue with the system. First, however, we must elucidate: this retort makes it seem as if every unwanted-at-conception child is immediately put up for adoption upon birth. This is not the case. Second, it presumes the same parents will never learn how to be good mothers or fathers and will raise their children horrible irrespective of whether or not they grow, as people, over the course of raising the child. We cannot say that either of these things happen 100% of the time. In fact, human history seems to denote a marked imbalance in percentages. Humans often grow into being good parents and learn to love unwanted children. That being said, it is obvious that some don't. We now move on to examining the system unwanted children are put into and see that it is most often deplorable. How do we move to make it better? It is obvious that, given the current system of general indifference to unwanted children, that the only way to effectively make the living standards of this niche voting group better is to experience a systemic shift. The only way for things to change in democratic states is to make it blatantly obvious that they need to. The system adapted brilliantly to the influx of children post ww2 throughout the west and we have no reason to doubt that the system would do the same now.
tldr: having more children, wanted or unwanted, seems to be a preferable alternative to the economic and societal hurdles that we must overcome provided we stay on this path
