>>106465792>They didn't do it in the autistic manner you seem to want.It's autistic to want to know how she's in danger when she's in danger, not after she's fine, healed up and now against something that can't possibly hurt her.
Alright then, guess I'm weird to want more than 'girl on winning streak but no chance of dying goes up against guy I have no reason to think is any good'.
>They did twice.They did it once, for less than a minute, and then revealed that the part you were not worried about was the part you were supposed to be worried about.
>I swear, people like you are why writing has become so dumbed down and everything just explained in pure exposition or shown multiple times when once was enough.Bull fucking shit, if that were true the minute someone presented that shitty businessman archtype for the villain they would have been laughed out of the room for even suggesting so tired, one note and all around garbage writing.
>Use your brain. I did and it's hilarious to imagine how this came about.
>ighters observe opponents they're about to fight, and if your opponent known for dismembering opponents then yeah, it's a damned good idea. Like look at it from his perspective. "She always rips chunks off. Now, you may say 'it's a fight, how do you know which limb, which part, and when in the fight she's going to rip it off? There's a million factors here', but I say to you, put swords in everything! Everything I say! No matter the juncture I will have swords!"
To be honest for a second I'm not even bothered by the arm blade, its that weird kind of so absurd it works. It's funny to think about how it came to be and a fun visual, minor hiccups like that don't hurt the story.
>More than you apparently I'm going to have to contest this.
>because you don't understand the concept of Ranking or how championships work.And I can tell you its not a victory based thing=stronger fighters. A boxer with 4 victories fought Muhammad Ali with 27.
