>>106378939>>106379039you're both right. Evidence exists, and bc its a civil suit he ONLY has to prove a preponderance of evidence (get to the 50 yd line) if he can show that Waids testimony and pressure on AP had ANYTHING to do with their reneging [which AP admitted to in a statement trying to DENY it] then it should be pretty open/shut
Waid has no defense against interference except the possible lack of detail on the contract, but that probably wont get far
Waid has a DUMB defense against defamation, claiming "its the truth so its not" and if Meyer can prove that Waid is a public enough figure, and Meyers is a private enough figure -hes got him dead on that
