>>106178928>This is not against rule 3.It most certainly is against global rule 3 because the OP is deliberately trying to piss people off, which is the textbook definition of trolling. /v/ermin post twitter threads all the fucking time with the exact same intention of the OP.
>Because if they're just similar faked tweets then it's a new thread each time.No it fucking isn't, they all the exact same general purpose of trying to troll people, by your idiotic definition of a "new thread", each and every single general on /vg/ is unique because they change the "_______ edition" tagline with each new thread.
>Spamming is repeating the same thread or post, typically over course of a short period.That may be the traditional definition of spam, but this kind is a type of slow burn spamming that people tend to do when trying to force a meme. The best example of this was sakurafish on /a/.
>There was no explicit or implicit call to raid her twitter accountEvery single twitter screencap thread is not only an attempt to troll, but also an implicit call to invasion because the OP always implies something along the lines of "HEY EVERYBODY, THIS FAGGOT SAID THIS THING, LET'S GO HARRASS THEM. AFTER ALL 4CHAN IS ANONYMOUS AND THERE IS NO WAY THAT THEY WILL KNOW THE RAID WAS ORCHESTRATED HERE."
This is exacerbated by the fact that dummy twitter accounts can be made with absolutely no effort at all.
>her twitter account is not personal, private information. It's a social media account that's accessible and searchable by anyone.I was referring to the raiding part of global rule 4, not the doxxing part.
