>>104969634Crumb is reasonably accomplished outside of illustrating his own fetishes though.
I'm still mad that one day on twitter a bunch of twitter people were yammering on about how Crumb was problematic, John Backderf popped into a thread to explain to them that a lot of Crumb's nastier work is pretty obvious satire, and enough people dog piled on him that he retracted and agreed that Crumb was problematic
